References

Benthem, Johan van. 2004. “What One May Come to Know.” Analysis 64 (2): 95–105.

Chisholm, Roderick M. 1967. “Identity Through Possible Worlds: Some Questions.” Noûs, 1–8.

Chisholm, Roderick M. 1973. “Parts as Essential to Their Wholes.” The Review of Metaphysics 26 (4): 581–603.

Gerbrandy, Jelle. 2007. “The Surprise Examination in Dynamic Epistemic Logic.” Synthese 155 (1): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-2211-7.

Hintikka, Kaarlo Jaakko Juhani. 1962. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions.

Kripke, Saul A. 2011. “On Two Paradoxes of Knowledge.” In Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers, Volume 1. Oxford University Press.

Leslie, Sarah-Jane. 2011. “Essence, Plenitude, and Paradox.” Philosophical Perspectives 25: 277–96.

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell.

Lewis, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Wiley Blackwell.

Lewis, David. 2008. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Wiley-Blackwell.

McGee, Vann. 1985. “A Counterexample to Modus Ponens.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (9): 462–71.

Salmon, Nathan. 1989. “The Logic of What Might Have Been.” The Philosophical Review 98 (1): 3–34.

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1968. “A Theory of Conditionals.” In Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance and Time. Springer.

Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.